a16z Podcast · Podcast summary
Who Grades the AI Models? | Ben Horowitz & Rayan Krishnan
Val.ai founder and CEO Reyan Krishnan joins a16z’s Ben Horowitz and Jennifer Li to discuss the increasingly difficult problem of measuring AI, why public benchmarks can give a distorted picture of model capabilities, why independent evaluation matters, and what it takes to test a new model in a few hours before it launches.
Listen on the show ↗Key takeaways
- 📊Public benchmarks can be misleading, as models may underperform on private, more rigorous tests while appearing highly capable on open-source benchmarks.0:06
- obsolescenceThe rapid pace of AI innovation means that evaluation methods can become obsolete almost as quickly as new models are released.0:57
- ⛰️AI evaluation needs to keep pace with the evolving frontier of what models can do, similar to how professionals like lawyers or architects must regularly re-certify their skills.1:17
- 🤯The increasing complexity of AI models and use cases makes it very difficult for companies to develop internal capabilities to perform comprehensive evaluations.1:28
- complexityAs AI models become more complex, evaluations are shifting from large sample sizes with simple criteria to smaller sample sizes with more complex criteria and expectations.1:32
- 🔄The concept of "recursive self-improvement" in AI, where models can train their next versions, is a critical area for evaluation to understand potential and risks.1:43
Chapters
- 0:53The Problem with Public Benchmarks
- 5:10The Need for a Rational Buying Market
- 8:11The “Six-Hour Pre-Release Window” and the Role of Infrastructure
- 9:07The AI Complete Problem: Evaluating Human-like Intelligence
- 11:44Industry Evolution and the Fluidity of AI Measurement
- 16:50The Recursive Self-Improvement Benchmark (RSI)
- 26:45The Economics of AI: Token Spend vs. Salary Spend
- 32:16Val.ai's Product: Val Smith for Code Generation
- 40:43The Policy Side: Defining Standards and Trust but Verify
- 1:00:51The Future Landscape of AI Evaluation
The digest
As AI models continue to improve at a rapid pace, the methods used to measure their capabilities are quickly becoming obsolete. This creates a significant challenge for companies investing heavily in AI, as they struggle to accurately assess which models perform best for their specific needs and whether their investment is truly yielding value. This episode features Reyan Krishnan, founder and CEO of Val.ai, in conversation with a16z’s Ben Horowitz and Jennifer Li, to explore the complexities of AI evaluation, the limitations of current benchmarks, and the critical role of independent third-party testing.
The Problem with Public Benchmarks
Reyan Krishnan recounts the founding of Val.ai in early 2024, driven by the realization that existing public benchmarks were insufficient for measuring model progress. He highlights a fundamental issue: the tight relationship between building new generation systems and developing new evaluation mechanisms. Often, improving one necessitates improving the other. Krishnan explains that while many interesting models were coming to market, it was becoming increasingly difficult to ascertain what was truly new and capable. This led to the conclusion that a third-party company was needed, solely dedicated to building high-quality evaluations and benchmarks to discern the true capabilities of these new models.
Ben Horowitz raises a pertinent question: why can't the labs building these models do this themselves? They possess the deepest understanding of their models and what capabilities are missing. Krishnan acknowledges that labs do build many great benchmarks, which drive model progress. However, he points out a critical issue: the self-reporting nature of model capabilities. He cites the example of Meta's Llama 4, which underperformed on Val.ai's private benchmarks but showed incredible capabilities on major public benchmarks. This disconnect between self-reported performance on open benchmarks and actual performance on higher-signal, private benchmarks underscores the need for independent evaluation.
Keep reading in The Digest
The full 2-minute article, 2 more sections, and every new episode from a16z Podcast and the creators you follow.
- The Need for a Rational Buying Market
- The “Six-Hour Pre-Release Window” and the Role of Infrastructure
More from a16z Podcast
Beyond the God Model | Alex Atallah & Amjad Masad
Alex Atallah of OpenRouter and Amjad Masad of Replit explore the future of AI through specialized models, neurodiversity, and enterprise independence.
AI Can Write Code. Why Isn’t Software Better?
Diogo Almeida, founder of TypeSafe AI, reimagines AI's role in software by introducing JEV, a new primitive that embeds intelligence within software to enable true automation beyond faster coding.
Building a Team at AI Speed | Harvey’s Maggie Landers
Maggie Landers, VP of Talent at Harvey, shares how the company hires and scales culture at AI speed while transforming the legal industry.
AI Safety Language Is Destroying the Debate | Steven Sinofsky
Steven Sinofsky, former Microsoft Windows President and A16Z board partner, argues that the current language around AI safety is making the technology harder to understand and hindering productive debate.
Nas, Grandmaster Caz, Steve Stoute & Ben Horowitz on Paying Hip-Hop’s Pioneers Their Due
Nas, Grandmaster Caz, Steve Stoute, and Ben Horowitz discuss the Payday Full Foundation's mission to honor hip-hop pioneers by providing both financial support and recognition, highlighting the industry's historical oversight and the profound impact this initiative has on artists' lives and the culture at large.
What Makes a Consumer AI Product Stick? | Josh Elman
A16Z partner Josh Elman joins new economies to discuss what it takes to build a lasting consumer product in the AI era. Josh explains why the best products start by doing one thing exceptionally well, become a habit, and then earn the right to do more.