MythBusters · Video summary
Does Attraction Actually Make You Dumber? | MythBusters
MythBusters investigates popular beliefs about attraction, including whether people get dumber around attractive individuals, if pheromones in sprays work, and if gentlemen truly prefer blondes.
Watch on YouTube ↗Key takeaways
- 🧠The Stroop effect is a reliable method to measure cognitive processing speed by observing the brain's pause when switching between identifying a word's color and its meaning.01:32
- 🔬When testing for cognitive impairment, a sparse, controlled environment is crucial to minimize external distractions and isolate the variable being tested.03:27
- 🚫The myth that attractive individuals make you dumber was busted for women, who showed no cognitive decline when an attractive male actor was present.07:29
- 📉While the overall myth was busted, some male participants did show a measurable slowdown in cognitive performance around an attractive female, suggesting individual variability.08:55
- 💨Pheromone sprays claiming to make wearers irresistible were busted, as the T-shirt with Adam's sweat and pheromones was both the most favored and most repulsive.17:28
- 🎭To eliminate personality bias in attraction studies, systematically swapping hair colors using wigs is an effective method.19:17
Chapters
- 0:00Introduction to the Science of Attraction
- 0:32Myth 1: Do Attractive People Make You Dumber?
- 0:55Designing the Cognitive Test
- 2:12The Stroop Effect Explained
- 4:09Setting Up the Experimental Space
- 6:43Introducing the Actors and Baseline Tests
- 10:16Women's Cognitive Ability Test Results
- 12:10Men's Cognitive Ability Test Results
- 17:14Myth 1 Conclusion: Busted
- 18:58Myth 2: Do Pheromone Sprays Work?
- 20:25Designing the Pheromone Test Device
- 22:09Preparing the T-Shirts for Testing
- 25:02Pheromone Test: Women's Reactions
- 28:48Myth 2 Conclusion: Busted
- 30:42Myth 3: Do Gentlemen Prefer Blondes?
- 32:19Designing the Speed Dating Experiment
- 34:04Round 1: Speed Dating with Initial Hair Colors
- 35:06Round 2: Hair Color Swap and Speed Dating
- 39:11Round 3: Final Hair Color Swap and Speed Dating
- 40:19Myth 3 Conclusion: It's a Tie!
- 41:32Final Thoughts on the Laws of Attraction
The digest
Attraction is a mysterious force, often attributed to intangible qualities like "chemistry" or "charm." But what if the allure of attraction could be broken down into scientific principles? The MythBusters team, Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage, set out to demystify several common beliefs about human attraction, exploring everything from cognitive impairment in the presence of an attractive person to the effectiveness of pheromone sprays and the age-old question of whether gentlemen truly prefer blondes.
Do Attractive People Make Us Dumber?
The first myth tackled by the MythBusters posits that people become "dumber" or less cognitively sharp in the presence of an attractive individual of the opposite sex. To test this, Adam devised a cognitive ability test based on the Stroop effect. This test measures the brain's processing speed by flashing words of colors (e.g., the word "BLUE" written in red ink) and asking the subject to identify the color of the ink, not the word itself. The inherent pause or "Stroop effect" as the brain switches tasks provides a measurable metric of cognitive function. Volunteers first established a baseline score in a neutral environment. Then, they repeated the test in a specially designed, sparse room, first with an actor of the same sex present, and then with an attractive actor of the opposite sex. The experimental setup included a two-way mirror and remote cameras, allowing Adam and Jamie to observe and record reactions without influencing the subjects. The results for women were clear: the presence of an attractive male actor did not negatively impact their cognitive ability; in fact, some women performed slightly faster. This suggests that for women, the cliché of being "tongue-tied" or cognitively impaired by an attractive man is, in fact, busted.
Keep reading in The Digest
The full 4-minute article, 3 more sections, and every new episode from MythBusters and the creators you follow.
- The Male Brain Drain: Fact or Fiction?
- The Allure of Pheromone Sprays
- Do Gentlemen Prefer Blondes?
More from MythBusters
Can Gummy Bears Actually Be Used As Rocket Fuel? | Mythbusters
Mythbusters tackles a fan-favorite myth: can gummy bears actually be used as rocket fuel? The team experiments with various gummy bear preparations to see if the sugary treats can propel a rocket.
MythBusters Tests Two Of The Most Explosive Myths In Their Final Season | Mythbusters
In their final season, the Mythbusters tackle two explosive myths: whether a cement truck can contain a dynamite blast in a mail truck, and if a hovercraft can safely traverse a minefield.
Can You Cook Shrimp By Firing Them Through a "Special" Gun? | Mythbusters
Mythbusters tackles two viral food fables: cooking shrimp by firing them through an air cannon and juicing fruit with explosives. They meticulously recreate the setups to determine if these bizarre culinary claims hold any truth.
Is The U-2 Spy Plane The Hardest Aircraft In The World To Land? | MythBusters
Mythbusters Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman investigate the U-2 spy plane's legendary difficulty to land and the potential lethality of commercial drones.
MythBusters Test a Law That Half The Country Disagrees With | MythBusters
MythBusters Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman tackle two common driving myths: whether hands-free phone use is as distracting as handheld, and if Hollywood-style reverse driving is possible in real life.
Could Walter White's Trunk Machine Gun Actually Work? | MythBusters
MythBusters tackles two explosive challenges: the literal meaning of "blowing it out of the water" with a ship and a depth charge, and the feasibility of Walter White's trunk-mounted machine gun from the Breaking Bad finale.